Tag Archives: Karachi

Steve Inskeep

Interview: Steve Inskeep – Author of Instant City

The NPR Morning Edition host talks about Pakistan, the subject of his new book, Instant City: Life and Death in Karachi, and why some people might find him annoying.

What drew you to Pakistan and Karachi, the countrys booming city of 13 million? It began as a place that I was assigned to go, but I began thinking that Karachi was a place where I could see the future. Because it is this unbelievably quickly growing city—and there are cities like that all around the world. This urban landscape is being created before our eyes, and it feeds on itself.

How stable is the political situation in Pakistan?It is stable in a massively unstable way, if that makes any sense. Obviously it’s a gravely serious political situation, and it’s a country where you think things can’t get any worse, and then there’s a giant flood. And yet there is a resilience in the people. When I’ve been in Karachi, there have been weeks when the entire city will shut down because there’s a massive gunfight, assassinations, people driving around on motorcycles with weapons and killing people. Businesses close, kids can’t get to school. Then the violence abates, and the city just comes to life again.

How is Karachi different from the area where Osama bin Laden was hiding? One remarkable difference is the role of women and the visibility of women. If you go to the far northwest, women almost universally have to cover their hair, and they will not be in positions of authority. In Karachi, there will be women who dress conservatively, but there will also be women who have been allowed to go get an education themselves. Women can make a wider range of choices about their lives.

Herald exclusive: An interview with Shehryar Fazli | | DAWN.COM

Mahvesh Murad | Herald Exclusive

“The wonderful thing about Jaipur was that although big names like Coetzee and Pamuk and Diaz were there, you felt that people were in fact just as interested in discovering new writers.” – File Photo

Raised in Paris, Mauritius and Pakistan, Shehryar Fazli now lives in Islamabad where he works at an international think tank. He graduated from McGill University and theUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst. Here he talks to the Herald about his debut novel, Invitation.

Q. Has Invitation been a long time in the making?

A. Yes. I started a novel about 11 years ago. None of what I wrote back then survived except some basic idea of a narrator who returns from the West after a long exile. I had those few pages lying around for years. Finally when I gave it another go, a story developed around that basic premise.

Q. When did you decide to set Invitation in pre-prohibition Karachi?

A. I was discovering more about this very fascinating time in Pakistan’s history — when popular demonstrations helped oust a military regime, democracy was being introduced for the first time, and then it all went wrong. I decided to eventually put my narrator in that mess and see what happened. I liked the results.

Q. The 1970s are almost a mythic time for people of our generation. There was so much happening that we can barely imagine possible now. You weren’t around then but have witnessed some equally tumultuous moments in Pakistan’s history. Why did you not choose to write about what you had experienced, the way other Pakistani writers have with 9/11, for example?

A. Well, let me first talk about what I liked about that period as the setting for this story. Shahbaz, the young narrator, lived his last 19 years in Paris which, in May 1968, went through a major historical convulsion itself. Shahbaz does not feel a part of it. He comes back to Karachi to settle a family property dispute on his father’s behalf. But, more than anything, for an abstract sense of citizenship. That was a time when I think many in Pakistan were acquiring a taste for it. That is, after all, what democracy is supposed to provide. Back then, democracy was just coming to Pakistan. So what better time for Shahbaz to make his entrance? Of course, things do not quite work out for him or many of the people around him. And the title perhaps conveys a sense of that promise.

Q. In many ways, Invitation is about just that — a search for a sense of belonging. It has been described as ‘Karachi noir’. Stylistically, is this how you write? Or is it a tone you developed specifically for this novel because of its setting?

A. I was a little surprised to see it described as ‘noir’. Not that I have an objection to that description but I never thought of it as noir myself. The voice I wanted, which is Shahbaz’s, is one that is on the surface constrained but with something a little reckless underneath that occasionally emerges in bursts. So it did not have much to do with the time of setting but with this particular, strange creature that is Shahbaz.

Q. Initially I found the tone of the narrator distant but as I began to get to know him I realised it was perfect. He is often distant and cold and no hero, as much as he would love to be. It’s not easy to decide to write in the voice of a person who is not likeable and it’s not something most writers would do for fear of alienating most readers who would rather relate to someone ‘nice’. And yet here you are.

A. I do not subscribe to that. I think unlikable narrators are far more compelling. And your description, I think, is absolutely right. His constraint, his inability to act, is what makes him such a nasty piece of work. The voice, I think, reflects that. But it was Evelyn Waugh who said that the job of fiction is to spread sympathy to unexpected places. I do hope readers warm up to Shahbaz eventually, despite everything, in the way they warm to a monster like Nabokov’s Humbert or Ishiguro’s Stevens in Remains of the Day.

Q. Invitation was launched in India where it has been published and you attended the Jaipur Literary Festival. Do you think festivals like that are important for writers to promote their books?

A. Before Jaipur, I attended the Kolkata Literary Festival which was my first event. We then did a launch in Delhi and I had two sessions in Jaipur. The Kolkata Festival, like Jaipur, had this buzz and energy to it because events like these, more so than any single book launch, bring together people who just love books. So it puts a writer, especially a first-timer, into contact with an audience he or she probably would not meet otherwise. The wonderful thing about Jaipur was that although big names like Coetzee and Pamuk and Diaz were there, you felt that people were in fact just as interested in discovering new writers. So, to answer your question, absolutely.

Q. Your novel is a welcome change to what the world has come to accept as Pakistani literature in English. It’s a throwback to a time when Pakistan was not known for what it is now. Do you think you are at a disadvantage, having distanced yourself from the 9/11 stories that are so popular nowadays?

A. Well, I would not like to think that readers are coming to these books because of the topic but because of the writing, the characters, and the human stories. I set my novel in a particular period not to educate but to explore a character’s very personal relationship to the events around him and I hope that it is that personal story that people are attracted to, just as I hope they are approaching a so-called post-9/11 novel not to learn anything new about 9/11 or terrorism, which there is plenty written about in other forms. And if that is the case, then I do not worry too much about being at a disadvantage because somehow my “topic” may be considered outdated.

Q. I know this may be a little early to ask, seeing as your very first book has only just been published, but what’s next?

A. I am somewhere close to midway through a second novel which does indeed take place in Pakistan. I think I will remain engaged as a novelist with this country for a while because there is such rich material here which I have not begun to tap. But yes, I would not want to confine myself to any particular subject or style or perspective. For example, one day I hope I can write a book from a female character’s point of view.

 

This book is available at Liberty Books

No survivors – The Express Tribune

ISLAMABAD: It was not until late Wednesday afternoon that the actual scale of the tragedy set in. It was then that all hope – even the slightest strand, slipped away from the families of 152 passengers on board Airblue flight ED 202.

There were no survivors.

At ten-to-ten Wednesday morning, the passenger jet swerved in the hazy skies over Islamabad, ultimately careening into the serene Margalla hills. All that was left is the remains.

The ‘rescue’ operation there was temporarily suspended in the night to resume on Thursday morning. “We have cordoned off the entire area and check posts have been established all around the site. The search and rescue operation will resume in the morning” said the Deputy Commissioner Islamabad, Amir Ali Ahmed.

Most importantly, he added, “We have no confirmation about the recovery of the black box.”

The most important component of the investigations, the black box, could not be found till the time this report was filed.

With the search for the aircraft’s black box still on, all that is known is the reported conversation between the control tower and the captain.

Officials of the Civil Aviation Authority claimed that the pilot of the plane had been warned by the control tower twice before its first failed attempt to land at Benazir Bhutto International Airport Islamabad.

“He was told that he was deviating from the runway. Subsequently, he was asked to turn to his left since he was heading straight towards the Margalla hills. He had replied to both warnings that he could see the runway, before he lost contact with the tower,” said an official.

When he headed towards the Margalla hills, the pilot was again contacted by the Radar tower, the official claimed. “The radar tower warned him that he was entering a danger-zone. The pilot did not reply. The tower again tried to contact him to warn him of his direction but received no reply” said the official.

For now, no one knows for sure what happened. Just that 152 people lost their lives.

The official said that the 62-year-old pilot of the plane, travelling from Karachi to Islamabad, Pervaiz Iqbal Chaudhry, was an experienced and professional pilot.

Over at the site, the scenes were bleak. Merely 15 to 20 dead bodies could be recovered in identifiable form from the site of the crash. Officials from Islamabad administration said there were no survivors. “There are no survivors. Rescue workers are collecting the remains of dead bodies from the site” said Imtiaz Inayat Elahi, the Chairman Capital Development Authority. Interior Minister Rehman Malik also confirmed that no one on the plane survived. There was no official word on the cause of the crash. However, officials of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) feared human error might have caused the plane to careen into the hills since the Airbus A321 had no technical problems and weather was not too bad at the time of crash.

Difficult mountainous terrain and overcast conditions hampered the efforts to access the site of the tragedy. More than two hundred rescue workers, police officials and volunteers, however managed to reach the spot within an hour of the incident. “All we could see were body parts. There were no injured,” said a volunteer Pervaiz Akhtar, who was among the first few people to reach the site of the crash. “We shifted the remains to the top of the hill from where they were lifted by helicopter” he added.

More volunteers and rescue workers reached the site later in the afternoon. It was not before 2:00 pm that the first ambulance carrying the remains left for the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims) Islamabad. Ambulances could not go beyond the Daman-e-Koh road, but the rescue workers managed to form a track through the thick forest surrounding the crash site to transport the remains on foot. “The forest is very thick. We had to cut the protruding tree branches and remove bushes to make a way for us to approach the site. It took us more than an hour to reach the spot and we walked for over an hour on our way back to Damn-e-Koh Road” said Allah Bakhsh, a rescue worker who, along with a group of volunteers, had brought five bundles of remains to the road from where they were shifted to Pims.

The hospital received remains of over 130 passengers till the filing of this report. At least 24 dead had been identified with the help of their identity documents.

The dead bodies of all identified victims were handed over to their families. The rest will be identified through DNA tests on Thursday. Talking to journalists, Minister for Health Makhdoom Shahabuddin said that DNA tests will be conducted on the remains to determine their identity.

According to eyewitnesses, the airliner hit the ridge on its belly first and then broke into pieces. “It was flying dangerously low. I screamed when it hit the hilltop with a bang. I was sure no one would have survived,” said Mussanif Shah who was an eyewitness of the deadly crash. “We rushed to the place and our fears came true. No one was alive there,” he added.

The official also said that, prior to the ill-fated plane, a Chinese airliner was diverted because of bad weather. In its initial inquiry report, the Civil Aviation Authority has claimed that poor visibility and the plane flying below the given altitude were the causes of the incident.

Experts said the black box, once found, would have to be sent to either France or Bangkok for interpretation of data captured in the box.

Published in The Express Tribune , July 29th, 2010.